7th Annual Meeting of the International Multisensory Research Forum
    Home > Papers > Marcus J. Naumer
Marcus J. Naumer

Visuo-tactile integration of 3D objects in fusiform gyrus
Single Paper Presentation

Marcus J. Naumer
Institute of Medical Psychology, Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Leonie Ratz
Institute of Medical Psychology, Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Notger G. Mueller
Brain Imaging Center (BIC), and Cognitive Neurology Unit, Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Jochen Kaiser
Institute of Medical Psychology, Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Grit Hein
Brain Imaging Center (BIC), and Cognitive Neurology Unit, Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

     Abstract ID Number: 74
     Full text: Not available
     Last modified: March 16, 2006
     Presentation date: 06/20/2006 4:30 PM in Hamilton Building, McNeil Theatre
     (View Schedule)

Abstract
Functional imaging studies of visuo-tactile (VT) processing revealed LOtv and IPS as the prime candidate regions for object-related VT integration (Amedi et al., 2005; Sathian, 2005). However, most of these studies computed conjunctions of unimodal visual and tactile activations. To test more strictly for VT integration (Beauchamp, 2005; Laurienti et al., 2005), we searched for regions that were activated by each of the unimodal conditions (V; T), and additionally responded more strongly to bimodal VT stimulation than to each of the unimodal conditions. Using fMRI, we assessed VT integration of natural (animals) and artificial 3D objects (“fribbles”; www.cog.brown.edu/~tarr/), while controlling for potential motor, naming, and imagery confounds. During natural stimulation, animal photographs were either presented canonically or mirrored horizontally. We mainly revealed four cortical regions that showed VT integration effects for 3D objects: right and left fusiform gyrus (FG), left LOtv, and left IPS. Interestingly, right FG showed the most robust VT integration effect that neither depended on the particular stimulus material (animals or fribbles) nor on orientation congruency. While VT integration of natural material involved rather anterior portions of right FG, abstract 3D material was integrated in a more posterior part of FG.

Research
Support Tool
  For this 
refereed conference abstract
Capture Cite
View Metadata
Printer Friendly
Context
Author Bio
Define Terms
Related Studies
Media Reports
Google Search
Action
Email Author
Email Others
Add to Portfolio



    Learn more
    about this
    publishing
    project...


Public Knowledge

 
Open Access Research
home | overview | program
papers | organization | schedule | links
  Top